Ask just about anyone, Hell ask yourself, what kind of an economic system does the US operate under? Most will proudly puff out their chests and proclaim we live in Capitalist nation! Others, those that have a more Libertarian bent, will tell you Free Market, maybe including Capitalism and a scowl or two noting that it would be a true Free Market if the damn Socialists would just get out of the way. A minority, but a growing minority, would identify the US as a mixed economy of Socialism and Capitalism. Not much mention of a Free Market from that group. And then there are the fringe players, most notably those that call the US a Socialist country, and that’s why nobody got a job.
It all gets complicated when you have mix and match economies all operating under one roof, but that is exactly what is happening in the US, and it is the misconceptions and conflations that both confuse people and moreover leads to many people making bad choices. For example, a lot of people conflate Free Markets with both Capitalism and Democracy. Each of those are actually separate attributes of a nation. Free Markets and Capitalism are two economic attributes, and Democracy is a political attribute. A nation does not need to have Free Markets for Capitalism or vice versa, and neither automatically makes a nation a Democracy. In a similar vein Socialism is also an economic attribute but it includes Democracy in the workplace and that becomes a template for a political form. Democracy is simply a means of governing by consent of the people.
The only point of confusion to clear up is the difference between Free Markets and Capitalism. Capitalism is ownership by individuals or groups of individuals of any enterprise. Note, not necessarily all enterprises, just any. Free Markets, on the other hand are an attribute of an economy that does not deal with ownership per se, but instead establishes that enterprises require minimum political oversight and are Free to operate in the Marketplace based almost solely on supply and demand. A Free Market system considers everything as a commodity. People and natural resources included. Commodification occurs regardless of who owns the enterprises, in fact a Free Market economy left unchecked, will lead a robust Capitalist economy into ownership almost exclusively by an oligarchy, which in medieval times the system was called feudalism.
Socialism, where ownership is by the people and a democracy is much more of a natural fit than the other end of the spectrum; Free Market Capitalism . However, as we all know, such a means of operating an economy defeats the risk taking that Capitalism (without Free Markets) endorses. Socialism is very good at doing the necessary work to maintain the Commons, a critical component of any society. The Commons are, for example, the air, waterways, roads, communications technology, schools, police, military, public parks, recreation facilities, libraries and even health care. There are more, but those are a good sample.
That leaves the rest beyond the Commons to Capitalism, but Free Markets does not even recognize the Commons, which by definition belongs to everyone. But over the past 40 years another aspect Capitalism has been buried by the advance of the Free Market. That is where Free Enterprise enters the picture. Now, many think that Free Enterprise and Free Markets are one and the same, but in fact their function is much different. Free Enterprise is a means to restrain Capitalism from its tendency to revert to feudal style economies. It places a premium on making sure that any enterprise, Capitalist or Socialist, are subject to the same rules. Thereby allowing Socialized enterprises to compete for talent and ideas equally. But more critically, it is the Free Enterprise economic attribute that prevents the monopolies and trusts that evolves into an oligarchy. Free Markets serve to protect existing industries and the people that run them. Just as in feudalism. The Free Market Capitalists control not only their industries, but the laws that regulate them and the money that feeds the lawmakers ability to hold onto their job. Free Enterprise operates within a legal structure, Socialism assures the legal structure benefits people. Together in an economy they both assure that ownership is based on ideas and ability to gather backers that will allow an enterprise to enter the market place. In many ways, it operates by Socializing Capitalism and encourages Democratic institutions to establish the rules and apply them equally to all enterprises.
Look at what has happened for the last 40 years in America, everywhere Free Enterprise is weakened and nearly eliminated, and the call is for Free Markets to operate as the guiding light for our economy. Free Markets are destroying both Capitalism and Democracy, while burying Socialism. Over time guiding our economies of the world to function as some combination of Free Enterprise and Socialism can evolve into something much better. Leaving it all to the Free Market will devolve back to feudalism and economic fiefdoms.
Fiat Currency Taxes - Part 4 by Brad Sandler January 2, 2018 LITERATE ECONOMICS There are only two critical functions that taxes perform. It forces the taxpayers of that…
The Stock Market by Vernon Justice January 21, 2014 ECONOMIC POLICY I laugh when I see people trying to get people to buy gold. It to…
[…] When a policy is morally based it already contains a critical component of a true Democratic Socialist society. Democratic Socialism is already consistent with the US Constitution in the clauses regarding eminent domain, the postal services, and interstate commerce; as well as the preamble’s commitment to “the general welfare”. Democratic Socialism also does not prohibit Free Enterprise Capitalism or fair and open elections. Any policy that restricts government’s ability to act for the general welfare, restrict Free Enterprise, prevent or hinder fair and open elections, are not Progressive policies. To clarify, Free Enterprise differs from Free Markets by the critical criteria that Free Enterprise promotes competition by any business that does not impinge on the General Welfare. Free Markets on the other hand promotes less regulation over the markets and prefers the market to provide all services even those that affect the General Welfare. Free Market Capitalism is not compatible with Democratic Socialism and Free Enterprise as I have defined it. […]
Loading...
JeanneFisher
February 25, 2017 12:33 AM
I have been a Democratic Socialist for about 40 years. I think we are pretty near being an oligarchy. I believe in capitalism just not unfettered capitalism.
[…] When a policy is morally based it already contains a critical component of a true Democratic Socialist society. Democratic Socialism is already consistent with the US Constitution in the clauses regarding eminent domain, the postal services, and interstate commerce; as well as the preamble’s commitment to “the general welfare”. Democratic Socialism also does not prohibit Free Enterprise Capitalism or fair and open elections. Any policy that restricts government’s ability to act for the general welfare, restrict Free Enterprise, prevent or hinder fair and open elections, are not Progressive policies. To clarify, Free Enterprise differs from Free Markets by the critical criteria that Free Enterprise promotes competition by any business that does not impinge on the General Welfare. Free Markets on the other hand promotes less regulation over the markets and prefers the market to provide all services even those that affect the General Welfare. Free Market Capitalism is not compatible with Democratic Socialism and Free Enterprise as I have defined it. […]
I have been a Democratic Socialist for about 40 years. I think we are pretty near being an oligarchy. I believe in capitalism just not unfettered capitalism.